KANCHA ILAIAH: THE INTELLECTUAL SLAP

 

KANCHA ILAIAH: THE INTELLECTUAL SLAP

                                                  -Yadukrishnan P

Kancha Ilaiah tears apart the Hindutva philosophy in his book Why I Am Not a Hindu. His words strike deep. There is no attempt to please the authority or even hints of covert subtlety in his criticism. Kancha’s way is more direct and to the point, never hesitating to write what he feels like. The fourth chapter in the book ‘Contemporary Hinduism’ is an exceptional example of his lack of censorship and appeasement. He rips apart the current notions and practices in society and deconstructs the contemporarily prevalent Brahminical Hinduism. His writing style is reflected here where we see him defy authority and existing traditions. Ilaiah is a very vocal critic of the current administration. Even in more recent issues that split the nation ideologically, Kancha never shied away from raising his own voice. On the recent reshuffling of the central cabinet, Kancha unleashed his input by saying that the reshuffling doesn’t help the OBCs or Dalits. “As long as there are foreign-educated, dominant-caste ministers who find a Cabinet position via Rajya Sabha, SCs, STs and OBCs will continue to lose out.” Kancha’s upbringing has indisputably influenced his growth as an intellectual. His growth from a Shepherd boy to one of the most polarizing intellectuals in India is an interesting case, to say the least. His family belonged to the sheep-grazing Kuruma Golla caste, a community designated by the Government of India as an Other Backward Class. He is vehemently opposed to the beef ban in India and his opinions on it can be seen as a clear indicator of his upbringing. In an article written in the economic times on the beef ban titled “How cow protection laws brutalise our culture, Kancha recollects memories of his mother, who was a pivotal influence on his later ideology and political stance. He writes,
                         "While my mother was understanding of the food and economic needs

of the Dalits, the bad side of her was that if a Dalit woman touched her

during work, she had to bathe and clean her clothes. This practice of

untouchability among the OBCs is one of the worst things that still

survives in our country." (Ilaiah enonomictimes)

 Aristotle once said, “Give me a child until he is 7 and I will show you the man.” These words reflect the progression of Kancha Ilaiah as a person as the experiences and the insights he gained throughout his childhood and young life is mirrored in most of his writings. He is indeed a product of his past. His works have an autobiographical touch to them. In an interview on amberkar.org, he goes into detail on how his childhood influenced him as a person.
                         “Q. what or who has been the major influence on your thinking and

                               your politics?

                    A. The most important influence on my life was the village in which I was born. As a child in the village I learnt how to breed sheep, till the land and make ropes, but what was particularly instructive was the interactions and contradictions between the different castes within the village—Kurumas, Kapus, Gowdas and Madigas. And it is this personal knowledge of the dynamics of caste that is central to my thinking and all my writings.” (Sikind)
             The same personal touch and autobiographical flair can be seen in his work Why I Am Not a Hindu as well. The fourth chapter in the book ‘Contemporary Hinduism’ is a comprehensive critique of Hinduism and Brahminical society. He explains how caste plays a major role in the subjugation of Dalitbahujans and how the issue of caste is deeply intertwined with the problem of discrimination. The author does not intend to go over the historical beginnings of caste and oppression. Instead, he portrays the harsh reality of caste-based society through his own experiences. How did the system of caste originate? Yuval Noah Harari in his world-famous book Sapiens tries to answer this.
                            “Brahmins and Shudras were not really created by gods from different body parts of a primeval being. Instead, the distinction between the two castes was created by laws and norms invented by humans in northern India about 3000 years ago” (Harrari 152)

Kancha Ilaiah is aware that the system of caste is merely a system of oppression and discrimination. But what makes him different is that he is not a passive observer of these issues. He is a victim of such oppression and has witnessed the fangs of caste-based division from a young age. Even in terms of education, Ilaiah explains his mother’s words, which accurately illustrates the rift between Hinduism and Dalibahujan culture
      “Saraswathi teaches the children of Bapanollu and Komatollu, but she

becomes a devil when it comes to our children. She will not allow our

children to read and write. She will kill them. That is how my elder son

died.” (Ilaiah caravan)

Another major influence on Ilaiah was undoubtedly Ambedkar. Kancha went a step further in calling him a “prophet to a people he created soul and politics for”. His main domain of writing is the annihilation of caste and most of his works are critiques of Hindutva and the brahminical Hindu society in general. His book God as Political Philosopher is a comprehensive study on Buddhism and how it is in fact a challenge to Brahminism. He acknowledges Buddhism as the counterculture to Hinduism which is something that Ambedkar also tried to do. Kancha is also cautious of the Hindutva attempt to Hinduize Buddha and Buddhism in this book

A SLAP IN THE FACE

 

The writings of Kancha Ilaiah are polarising, to say the least. His views and works haven’t been accepted by everyone. Being a prolific political commentator, he has faced backlash and criticism from Hindutva activists. He has been called out by them because he accepted the Aryan Invasion theory. His house was ransacked in 2010 by right-wing activists. Ilaiah stays firm in his views even after countless threats. Staying true to his carefree nature when it comes to dialogue, Kancha consistently goes into debates with the people who threaten him. He speaks his mind even while facing massive repercussions. The slap in the face here is purely metaphorical. An intellectual slap. One against the system of caste.

 

CONTEMPORARY HINDUISM – AN UGLY TRUTH

Kancha Ilaiah systematically and methodically goes over Hinduism and dismantles the deeply woven discrimination seen in a Brahminical society. His arguments are from experience. His college education, Universities, civil society and even politics. Kancha in essence criticises the social, cultural, intellectual and political aspects of the caste-ridden Hindu society. He says he realised that the structure of education is far larger than those he witnessed in his home town.) Kancha says that everything he came across during his journey of education was Brahminical narratives. It told the stories of the Brahmin and Kshatriya communities. Their dreams and their stories. "We had been excluded from history. It seemed that our history was no

history at all" (Ilaiah 54)
The reluctance of the system to change its barbaric ways is also something that Kancha talks about. There was silence when it came to caste and caste-related problems. Even among the upper-class teachers who are liberals including radical liberals, the conspiratorial silence continued. They lived and practised caste hegemony. To them, caste was a class issue without realising that in the opposite of Hindu culture lay the Dalitbahujan culture. Caste is obviously a system of oppression and this is seen in society as a whole as well. In hotels, which were supposed to be the melting pots of capitalism, this Brahmanism continued. The names, posters and calendars had Brahmanical names and pictures. Government jobs were no different too. Dalitbahujans had little to no representation in the government sector and even though some scheduled castes entered the officer positions, they were brutally discriminated against by the upper caste workers. Kancha says that these officers actually gave them hope.

THE IRONIC HUMOUR OF POLITICS

The criticism Kancha unleashes on political parties is perhaps the most polarizing aspect of his writings. Politics is something that divides people into epistemic bubbles after religion. Kancha points out the existence of caste even in liberal political parties. He uses the example of Congress and the communist party. Staying true to his controversial personality, he says that the relationship between upper caste leaders and Dalit workers was similar to that of Rama and Hanuman. The Dalits had the job of being subservient to their Upper caste leaders. Dalit workers had the job of singing praises and gathering the masses for melas. His main point was that the leaders were almost always upper-caste Brahmins or Baniyas (Ilaiah 59). The irony is perhaps more prevalent and evident in the communist party. A party that clearly advocates for the liberation of workers and the lower class mostly had upper caste leaders. In the Marxist–Leninist interpretation, all modern religions and churches are considered as "organs of bourgeois reaction" used for "the exploitation and the stupefaction of the working class". But rather ironically, the communist party in India practised covert casteism. The materialistic worldview was ignored as the leaders stayed Hindu in daily life. They had Hindu friends and were wealthier than the workers (Ilaiah 61).

 

                           Kancha Ilaiah

The question of caste according to Kancha Ilaiah isn’t something that we can ignore. Even though Dalits have tried to ‘sanskritize’ themselves, it did not help the situation of the Dalit’s. Kancha reminds us that this is the reason why people like Ambedkar tried to establish an entirely different counter culture to Hinduism through Buddhism.

Kancha Ilaiah and his intellectually radical ideas regarding the annihilation of caste remains a constant source of debate and discourse in our country. His place is crucial and irreplaceable in the current extreme right-wing political sphere of contemporary India
 

 

 .

Works Cited

Ilaiah, K. Why I Am Not a Hindu: A Sudra Critique of Hindutva philosophy, culture and political economy (Calcutta: Samya, 1996)

Ilaiah, K. God as Political Philosopher: Buddha's Challenge to Brahmanism (Calcutta: Samya, 2001)

https://m.economictimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/how-cow-protection-laws-brutalise-our-culture/articleshow/53691544.cms

http://www.ambedkar.org/reformers/KanchaIlaiah.htm

https://caravanmagazine.in/education/kancha-ilaiah-shephard-memoirs

https://magazine.outlookindia.com/story/the-ethereal-realist/280966

https://theprint.in/opinion/why-modis-cabinet-reshuffle-doesnt-really-benefit-scs-sts-and-obcs/696321/

Harrari, Yuval Noah. Sapiens: A Brief History of Humankind, 2011

 

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

BANARAS

"THE BELL TOLLS FOR THEE"

CHILDREN OF HEAVEN